<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Publish or Perish on dennogumi.org</title>
    <link>https://www.dennogumi.org/tags/publish-or-perish/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Publish or Perish on dennogumi.org</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>&amp;copy; 2026 Einar under a CC-BY-SA 4.0 license. Some images are AI-generated. Header design by [Melissa Adkins](https://melissaadkins.com) with [assets from Freepik](https://freepik.com).</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 07:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.dennogumi.org/tags/publish-or-perish/feed/atom.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    <item>
      <title>FOSS and research</title>
      <link>https://www.dennogumi.org/2008/05/foss-and-research/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 07:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://www.dennogumi.org/2008/05/foss-and-research/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve been wondering about why FOSS is often compared to the academic world, but at least in my limited experience, I see little people that grasp its concept in the world of research. On a quick look, developing FOSS in a research environment would be very good: not only you&amp;rsquo;d get publicly available results when you publish, but at the same time you can make sure that in an extreme case your application will be carried on by someone else should you not be able to continue development.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Brain drain</title>
      <link>https://www.dennogumi.org/2007/12/brain-drain/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 11:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://www.dennogumi.org/2007/12/brain-drain/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;There is always a lot of talk about &amp;ldquo;brain drain&amp;rdquo; (&lt;em&gt;fuga di cervelli&lt;/em&gt; in Italian) from my country. I keep on reading disgruntled comments of low pays and poor research, and that going abroad is the only solution for an Italian scientist to be successful.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;While I believe that research done outside of my country can be handled better (but it&amp;rsquo;s impossible to know for sure: never tar everyone with the same brush), I think that, also thanks to the way the media and the scientists themselves handle it, in everyone&amp;rsquo;s view it has almost become like the El Dorado. And that, in my opinion, is incorrect.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Buggy bioinformatics software</title>
      <link>https://www.dennogumi.org/2007/11/buggy-bioinformatics-software/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://www.dennogumi.org/2007/11/buggy-bioinformatics-software/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;As people who read my science-related posts know already, I&amp;rsquo;m not a big fan of &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.dennogumi.org/2006/11/software-and-biology/&#34; &gt;software made just to support a publication&lt;/a&gt;. Recently I&amp;rsquo;ve stumbled again into similar software. Namely, I&amp;rsquo;m talking about the &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.tm4.org/mev.html&#34;  target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noreferrer&#34;&gt;TIGR Multiexperiment Viewer (TMeV)&lt;/a&gt;, a Java-based program which is often used for microarray analysis. It&amp;rsquo;s not exactly &amp;ldquo;fit for publication&amp;rdquo;, because it has reached version 4 last year, but shows some of the problems (&lt;a href=&#34;https://www.dennogumi.org/2007/03/genbugg/&#34; &gt;mentioned already&lt;/a&gt;) with releasing bioinformatics software.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I use TMeV mostly because I didn&amp;rsquo;t find any other implementation of the hierarchical clustering algorithm with support trees. However, I&amp;rsquo;ve stumbled upon a very annoying bug in the most recent version. Normally I use average linkage clustering and as the distance metric I employ the Pearson&amp;rsquo;s correlation, and with gene and sample bootstrapping: with certain files this makes TMeV report errors at random during the iterations.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
